Other key discussion points during Thursday meeting:
Definition of entertainment complexes
The committee debated the most appropriate and transparent terminology. Several options were proposed to ensure public understanding and legal clarity. Ultimately, the term “integrated entertainment complexes with casinos and online gambling” was selected for its comprehensiveness and alignment with draft legislation.
Legal considerations
An initial proposal to form a separate legal subcommittee was rejected due to concerns it would undermine the importance of legal aspects in the casino debate. Legal matters will instead be covered under the Social and Legal Impacts Subcommittee. Discussions also touched on the political power dynamics that may affect future legislative efforts, with calls to consider constitutional protections.
Neutrality and timeline
Chairman Veerapun stressed the importance of neutrality, stating, “We must set aside personal opinions and remain as impartial as possible to hear all sides.” He emphasized that the committee has no predetermined conclusions and aims to provide well-rounded recommendations for both the government and the public.
Although the original timeline allowed 180 days, the committee now aims to complete its report by the end of July 2025, ahead of the parliamentary session beginning in early July. Members expressed concern that the government may propose legislation before the study is finalized.
Public referendum
The meeting also briefly addressed the need for public consultation and referenda. However, no concrete process has been outlined yet. “There is still no decision on how this will be carried out,” said Veerapun, noting that further discussions are planned.
1
20
20
